|
|
Post by Aimee Nicole on May 10, 2012 2:58:08 GMT -6
The episode opened with a great action sequence that really showcased what I believe has been your best writing - it felt different to the way you write the Outcasts, not just in tone, but also in the way you've formatted it. It was snappy. Quick and to the point, but also insanely descriptive. I really enjoyed it! This style of writing has been something that's actually grown on me over the last few months and I'm going to try to integrate it into the Outcasts once the reboot starts. I felt like changing it up eleven episodes in would be a little off-putting so I've held back quite a bit, but I'm glad you liked it here. I really enjoyed writing it this way, and it helped me actually even more detail into what I was seeing in my head down on paper without it being insanely thick like Outcasts was when I first started writing. I'll definitely have to try to stick with this style. It's went over well. I loved the description of Abigail: "behind them we see an unwavering determination in her blue eyes, but a softness hidden deep within." It gave us insight into the kind of person she was, and really highlighted the fact that this is someone who may not necessarily be the "what you see is what you get" kind of girl. There's layers to her - and peeling them back, and getting to the core of this character is something that I'm looking forward to. Abigail is definitely a character that has several layers that we'll get to delve into as the series goes on. I think she's going to be one of the most likable (or hated, depending on your preference) characters in this series. Or, at least I hope she is. I have to extend on what Brady said, in regards to your shows having a homosexual main protagonist. Exploring both heterosexual and homosexual characters and relationships on The Outcasts felt like a perfect, and unique idea, and it really worked well for the show because of how they are mutants, and not all of them are accepted by society, yet they still fight for it, and protect it. To not only change the genders, but also the sexuality of those characters -- it really emphasized one of the key aspects of the series, and I always applauded that. That said, my main problem centers around Brady's comment - it does get repetitive. Personally, I read all relationships, and view all relationships, the same - whether its a man and a woman, or two women or two men. Its still love, and romance, and all of that. However, whereas its something I felt was creatively great for the Outcasts, I'm not quite sure how I feel about another character, in a long list of characters from your "Marvel Universe" sharing homosexual traits, especially when its often rare to see heterosexual relationships develop in this vast universe you've moulded with the Outcasts, and later Age of Heroes, and now with Nightstalkers. I think its great to have main homosexual protagonists, however... looking at what your response to the topic was: "a lot of shows feature main characters that are heterosexual and the universe Maddie and I have created is aimed not only at the normal audiences but also to appeal to audiences that aren't usually appealed to directly," I have to say that there doesn't seem to be a balance for audiences (in terms of the universe you've created, not this series in particular), and that your aim to appeal to both seems to favor one more than the other. I don't mean to offend, but I think it would be interesting to see a heterosexual relationship develop in this universe. In terms of Abigail, it comes down to how you see the character - you know, what is her sexuality? Either one is fine. My main point to get across is finding some balance, and whether or not we'll see a heterosexual relationship get as much development and focus than a homosexual one (especially with this series not sharing the same themes as The Outcasts). We discussed this in the chat box, but for those with this same concern that didn't see it -- Nightstalkers has no gender-swapping and all original sexual orientations for the characters were kept. There was a bit of confusion on Abigail before the show was written, but it fell into place as-is because it's what best fit the character and the show. There was no gender-swapping to create homosexual couples or anything like that (which, wasn't the case in the Outcasts either but I digress). Watching Blade, I loved the "blind" character. Here, Taylor just stands out from the others. The fact that she can do so much, yet be at a disadvantage - its really something I hope to see develop more and more over the course of the series. Zoey, on the other hand, has quite an adorable relationship with Abigail, and I think, going off of that beautiful description of her, a key to unlocking that softer side to Abigail is shown through her interactions with Zoey. She is one of those characters that I think will ground Abigail, keep her human in such a demonic world, you know? Taylor and Zoey both are Abigail's grounding. Though, Zoey definitely ends up playing a bigger part in that as the series goes on. Zoey actually becomes a pretty important character, I like to think, over the course of the series. She's not going to stay some side character -- I do eventually want her in a spotlight because she has so much room to grow as a character. Lastly, I have to comment on "story." This was keeping me from reviewing because I didn't know how to discuss that. I think this episode introduces the characters well, established a solid relationship between them, but looking at the story, I wasn't quite able to summarize it, and figure out WHAT the story for this episode was truly about. Its hard - a webisode goes for 10 pages, and you can't have a mindblowing storyline for each little addition. So I'm a bit torn. I felt like you introduced the characters perfectly, you had some build up involved that gave us insight into what to expect in this arc, if not, sequence. You opened the episode with an exciting battle, and you ended with our characters setting off for another one. I have no knowledge of the characters in the Blade series, or anything to do with that aspect of Marvel, so a few references may have gone over my head, but all in all, I quite enjoyed this. It was a pretty great first episode. 9/10. I'm still getting used to the whole webisode thing, so I understand I probably did some things wrong. I really like the format, and I definitely prefer it over a major, full-length series (at least for right now) for this show in particular because of Outcasts and any potential that R.A.N.G.E.R.S has. I like writing it, I like working with it, but I'm still learning. So I'm probably gonna have a few mistakes here and there as I learn. I think the second episode is better, in regards to a solid story -- but we'll see, I guess XD. Thanks so much for reading and reviewing, Jack! I know you're really busy, so it means a lot that you took the time to do it. You know I always appreciate your feedback. |
|
|
|
Post by maddiefack on May 10, 2012 5:03:35 GMT -6
Alright guys hopefully most of you have realized I don’t really respond much and I let Aimee take over but there have been a few reviews and comments about our characters and our universe and their sexuality and while I know Jack you’ve got it squared away with Aimee you and Brady cannot be the only ones who feel this way and so I’ma break this down for all viewers with the same thought as you two in parts. (And Jack and Brady please don’t feel this is directed at you guys in a bad way because it’s totally not) First: The Universe. There are three different shows with three different sets of characters as follows: Outcast [The Reboot]: Melanie Haelstrom – Homosexual Gwen Stacy – Homosexual Mary-Jane Watson – Bisexual Felicia Hardy – Bisexual Kristen Sparks – Homosexual Jean Grey – Homosexual Bobby Drake – Heterosexual Warren Worthington III – Heterosexual Hank McCoy – Heterosexual Charles Xavier – Heterosexual Ororo Monroe – Bisexual Age of Heroes: Tony Stark - Heterosexual Don Blake - Heterosexual Bryce Banner - Heterosexual Jon Van Dyne - Homosexual Henry Pym - Homosexual Steve Rogers - Heterosexual Becky Barnes - Heterosexual Carol Danvers - Heterosexual Clint Barton - Heterosexual N’Yami T’Challa - Homosexual Reed Richards - Heterosexual Sue Storm - Heterosexual Jonnie Storm - Homosexual Ben Grimm - Heterosexual Allegra Amaquelin – Pansexual, that’s right but there’s a reason for this. Allie’s powers are bound in all elements so she has a connection with all life forces and as such can be attracted to all life forces. Nightstalkers: Abigail Whistler – Homosexual Taylor Sommerfield – Bisexual Hannibal King – Heterosexual Totals: Heterosexual – 15 Homosexual – 8 Bisexual – 4 Pansexual – 1 Total Percentages: Heterosexual – 53.6% Homosexual – 28.6% Bisexual – 14.3% Pansexual – 3.3% **According to The National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior in 2010 nearly 6,000 people nationwide between the ages of 14 and 94 found that 7 percent of women and 8 percent of men identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual. That would be 15% of 6,000 people. Yes our character percentage is more but is it off the charts? Second: The Reasoning In our alternate universe we wanted to which some genders and while Scott to Kristen. Peter to Melanie, but can anyone really imagine Jean Grey as a dude? MJ as a dude? If you can, more power to you but we couldn’t. We wanted to change up the universe to make it ours to make it have demographics for everyone to enjoy and to be a little off beat but keep the core of what the comics are along with our own ideas. More specifically with Nightstalkers we both thought in dept with Abigail’s sexuality. At first we thought Abby would be with Hannibal actually but after watching the Blade Trinity movie and some of the comics we realized they were much more like siblings and on top of that we saw something between Sommerfield and Abby so we ran with it. On top of all of it. We draw for our own experiences to make these shows amazing. It’s US in these characters and we twist them make them different but at their core a lot of these characters are us and that’s what makes them so real to us especially. It’s this connection to these characters that make Outcasts well…Outcasts. Third: The Conclusion Aimee and I put so much thought into this show. We have a list of arbitrary questions that range from sex to favorite foods to fears to little joys even how jealous they are in relationships. And we’ve discussed all these questions for ALL the characters listed about and THEN some. We aren’t arbitrarily making characters homosexual or heterosexual or anything. We aren’t trying to make a statement. We aren’t trying to force anything on our readers. We try to cover everything. From the happy to the sad. Marriage, domestic partnership, open relationships, religion, sexual orientation, race, gender, high school teen drama, drugs, alcohol, politics, economic, child abuse, sexual abuse and rape. You name it we’re gonna try to do it. That’s life guys and we write what we think, how we think and most of you have been through about 11 episodes of this journey with us. Have we been trying to drive some message home with anyone? If we did I guarantee it was subconscious. On top of that if we had heterosexual couples no one would have said anything. I won’t be surprised that in Age of Heroes most of them are heterosexual and there’s only two homosexual couples and no one would say anything. So I ask you all: Why does it matter? How is a few lead homosexual couples anymore repetitive than the thousands of heterosexual couples? The only way we could ever be original is if our main characters were asexual oh wait Big Bang Theory kinda already did that. I’m just utterly confused as to why this is worth being brought up. People are people. Relationships are relationships. Eventually aliens are going to show up in the shows, they’re kinda important to the Marvel Universe but is anyone gonna say much about that? Interspecies relations? Maybe some will, maybe some won’t but again I ask does it matter? >.> Sorry this post is so long and I’m not trying to push anyone off I just feel like our writing is being scrutinized over something that should not matter in the slightest and I wanted to explain it in the best way I could. I hope this ends here because from all of your reviews Outcasts seems well loved and I just don’t understand why NOW why after over a year of Outcasts being followed of its sister show being picked up and now a webisode series possibly going into action to show yet another view of our universe and now people are mentioning the homosexual theme placed in it. Again I say this post is not geared just toward Jack and Brady because we know there are other people thinking the same thing, I just needed to get this out. I think/hope that covers it all Duces Maddie  |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Malone on May 10, 2012 5:34:53 GMT -6
While the breakdown was interesting to look at, I have to disagree with the comment "if we had heterosexual couples no one would have said anything." I've been asked about having homosexual relationships on Watchtower, and I know Chris has been asked too, whether or not homosexual relationships will appear on Trinity. Its not something that is exclusively linked to YOUR shows, and I don't think its something that is brought up ONLY because of the fact this universe has homosexual lead characters. My main point in all of this is that so far within this universe we haven't seen as much focus on a heterosexual relationship as we have seen on a homosexual relationship. Next season on Watchtower, there will be a homosexual relationship, and it will be a huge arc of that season, and will have the same amount of focus on it than I've put on Chloe/Oliver, or Selina/Bruce. Its not a matter of telling us which characters have what sexual orientation, I personally think its a matter of showing us, and focusing on both relationships. I knew this was a touchy subject, but I think its definitely something worth mentioning as you and Aimee plan to extend and build upon your version of the Marvel Universe. I don't think its as black and white as 'if they were heterosexuals, this conversation wouldn't be happening'. One of the main reasons I brought it up was because of Aimee's comment, which I put in my review. I applaud the decision to appeal to both audiences, and all the relationships on The Outcasts have been developed brilliantly, in my honest opinion, however, I do think that there hasn't been as much focus on a heterosexual relationship than there has been with quite a handful of homosexual relationships. That was what I wanted to get across, and question. So on the question of "Why does it matter?" -- that's my answer: there may be heterosexual characters in the universe, but there hasn't been as much focus on their relationships, as oppose to gay characters in the universe. This conversation, and this topic in general, had no effect on my review whatsoever. I did not think LESS of the episode, or the writing due to this discussion, and I thought it was rather clear in both mine and Brady's review that we loved the writing. The reason why I gave the pilot a 9 instead of a 10 was explained in the review - it was more that I had a hard time trying to find a solid story within the episode. The characters, the writing itself, it was all done brilliantly. I loved the episode. But the "story" is where I took "1" away. I hope you both know that I've been nothing but supportive of the shows within this universe, and I'm looking forward to seeing more of this webisode series in particular. XD |
|
|
|
Post by maddiefack on May 10, 2012 5:47:25 GMT -6
But Jack. Nightstalkers haven't even aired yet, neither has Age of Heroes, and Outcasts have only had one season. How can we explore all these relationships? We have to build them up. We have to show most of the characters as they are OUTSIDE of a relationship before throwing them in one. And that goes for a lot of other objections you've had with Outcasts that I've noticed, you find it irrelevant until three episodes later but that's how shows work. That's how story telling works.
I understand your point and as I said my post was universal to all viewers not just you but it's going to take a long time for some of these characters to develop real relationships. That's human nature.
---------------------------------------------------
Oh no dude it's sooo not about the review XD Aimee and I have just had this problem in the past and you and I are so good at having debates to get all the points across. I'm not offended at all and neither is Aimee. >.> Sorry mah bad if it came out that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aimee Nicole on May 10, 2012 5:50:54 GMT -6
^ And to tack on to what Maddie say, the Outcasts reboot (because I know with the like, abundance of female characters it was really difficult to do this) will have a development for at least one heterosexual couple in the first season. And, had the season progressed as it was going to before the reboot was decided on, there was going to be a relationship -- Between Kitty and Bobby. That said, I think after the reboot airs, this won't even be an issue anymore. EDIT: THANKS BOTH OF YOU CRACKERS FOR EDITING YOUR POSTS AFTER I CAME IN HERE! But it's okay. I still love you guys. -side eyes- |
|
|
|
Post by Jack Malone on May 10, 2012 6:02:52 GMT -6
But Jack. Nightstalkers haven't even aired yet, neither has Age of Heroes, and Outcasts have only had one season. How can we explore all these relationships? We have to build them up. We have to show most of the characters as they are OUTSIDE of a relationship before throwing them in one. And that goes for a lot of other objections you've had with Outcasts that I've noticed, you find it irrelevant until three episodes later but that's how shows work. That's how story telling works. I understand your point and as I said my post was universal to all viewers not just you but it's going to take a long time for some of these characters to develop real relationships. That's human nature. I understand the concept of "build up". Sometimes, when you have an entire arc that is so divorced from the main plots of the episode, that are there for the sole purpose of "build up", they ARE irrelevant for that episode - not the season, or the series, but for that episode they are. But, in regards to the relationships, a lot of relationships were developed in the first 11 episodes of The Outcasts, and none of them were heterosexual. Again, I loved that so many main characters were homosexual, creatively, it added a lot more to the story of the X-Men that made this series stand out, but it was also refreshing to have that shift of focus because so many shows do focus on heterosexuals as the main source of "relationships". But that doesn't mean there should be no focus on a heterosexual relationship whatsoever. The reason its being brought up here is because this webisode series is extending the universe, and I thought it was important to mention that we haven't seen any heterosexual relationships yet, and maybe developing one would be something to think about. The whole thing stems from "focus", and like I said, we haven't had any focus on a heterosexual relationship in this universe yet, whether there are characters on the show that are straight. |
|
|
|
Post by Aimee Nicole on May 10, 2012 6:28:30 GMT -6
Alright, I'm going to put this whole thing to rest with this. I think we're all understanding the other's viewpoints, and the issues at hand here, but I don't want the discussion to keep clouding up this pitch thread. I also want to point out to everyone that this was NOT an argument. Jack, Maddie and I have taken no offense to this (as far as I know) and that it was simply a discussion that was opened up and obviously needed to be had. So a few points to sum up before we try to wind this down.
The gender-swapping of characters in the VPN's Marvel Universe was intended to be creative. It's how we saw certain characters for our universe, and the reason why others weren't swapped is because it was strange to us and we couldn't see it. Like Maddie said: If you can see Jean Grey or Mary Jane as a male, that's awesome, but we couldn't and if we forced it, well -- you guys know what happens when you force something you can't really see. We didn't just not gender-swap the other person because we wanted a homosexual relationship. We did it because it didn't work for us.
As for the issue with their not being a development of straight characters, it's like Maddie said. Age of Heroes hasn't aired yet, and Nightstalkers hasn't even been picked up. I see the "skepticism", I guess you could call it, but all I can say is give me a chance. I come off as spastic and disorganized, but I promise you I'm not and I have all this stuff down -- with Maddie's help, of course.
I guess I've kinda pushed myself into a corner with the Outcasts having two lead characters being homosexual that it's automatically assumed everything else in the universe will be the same way. I said at the end of my last post that by the time the reboot airs, this won't even been an issue. There is going to be one rather major heterosexual relationship developing in the first season and more as the series progresses. Age of Heroes has a few as well, obviously, and Nightstalkers, provided that it gets picked up, will too. I know I kinda messed up with the first go around; I got a lot of scrutinizing comments about the gay characters on Outcasts, and there not being enough straights ones. That contributed partially to the reboot as well. A do-over on that regard, too, I guess. Like I said, just give me a chance to show that and this won't even be an issue anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brady Brown on May 10, 2012 18:41:22 GMT -6
Review: 1x02 “Like Father, Like Daughter”
I enjoyed the flashback. It gave the reason why Abigail is doing what she is doing, and it introduced us to her father, Abraham Whistler. I like his attitude, towards his daughter. He’s strict and determined, and I really enjoy him.
I like the training scene, while Abigail was attacking the dummies. It was detailed really and I could picture it really nicely. And it was just fun to read!
And, even though Blade was only in this episode for, like, a scene, it really showed what a bad-ass he is. And that nobody messes with him, or they’ll end up like those vampires he killed. xD
I did have one or two issues, though -- the first being the use of the word “f***ing”. It just kind of threw me for a loop, and kind of caught me off guard. To me, a script can work just as well without the word, as it could have with it. But if there is a legitimate reason to why it was in there, then I can respect your decision and overlook it.
Second, this episode felt like it focused on Abraham, more than it did on Abigail. To me, it felt like he was the main character and not her. That was something I picked up on.
Overall, I really enjoyed this episode. I think this series could fit perfectly in the universe you have created, and I think many people could get behind it. Please don’t think I didn’t like this with the things I pointed out, because I really did enjoy this. And I support this, and good luck to you, Aimee, and anyone else working on this!
8.5/10 -- great second episode with very few flaws.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2012 19:37:52 GMT -6
Review: 1x01 "Along Came A Nightstalker"[/i]
Okay can I say Aimee you are the queen of descriptions. From start to finish you brought me into this world, described every detail, in far less words, and kept me interested the whole way. Bravo mame! The beginning 'fight' scene (I quote it because let's face it neither vamp had a chance Lmao!) was so well done. I could envision the whole thing and I even did a couple "Yays!" when Abigail landing blows to both Vampiric foe.
Ouch! Um. Very descriptive with the blade to the crotch Aimee. I felt that poor vamps pain. HAHA! I love Abigail already. She's had one line and it was practically the same line as the vamp but it was executed beautifully. I love the wit.
I'm scared now. Whenever a show, especially one with action, and or violence, brings a kid into the picture I automatically get all poppa bear like and I don't want anything to happen to this kid. DO YOU HEAR ME AIMEE NOT A SINGLE SCRATCH!! Lmao! I love the playfulness between Abigail and Zooey.
A blind techy? Love it! I like the dynamic between Taylor and Abigail. Oh and they turned out to be a couple. I was just sitting here thinking "They may be flirting with eachother". Lmao! I love being right. XD And Mr. Spark's name's been dropped. I love the connections the 'shows' are making already.
Great episode, excellent descriptions, interesting characters, I don't have a bad thing to say about it. Loved it. 10/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aimee Nicole on May 10, 2012 21:17:09 GMT -6
I enjoyed the flashback. It gave the reason why Abigail is doing what she is doing, and it introduced us to her father, Abraham Whistler. I like his attitude, towards his daughter. He’s strict and determined, and I really enjoy him. Both because of the movies, and the comics, I could never see Whistler any other way. He's the Magneto and Xavier of the Blade (in this case, Nightstalkers) universe. He can't be changed, in my eyes. So I'm glad you like him. ^^ I like the training scene, while Abigail was attacking the dummies. It was detailed really and I could picture it really nicely. And it was just fun to read! Thanks! I'm really glad you guys are liking the descriptions in these webisodes. Like I told Jack, it's something I'm really trying to focus on and get down-packed. Seems like it's working so far! And, even though Blade was only in this episode for, like, a scene, it really showed what a bad-ass he is. And that nobody messes with him, or they’ll end up like those vampires he killed. xD We probably won't see Blade all that often, but I really aim to make all of his appearances like this. They may be small, but he'll be a bad ass and he'll be kicking ass. I did have one or two issues, though -- the first being the use of the word “f***ing”. It just kind of threw me for a loop, and kind of caught me off guard. To me, a script can work just as well without the word, as it could have with it. But if there is a legitimate reason to why it was in there, then I can respect your decision and overlook it. It's like I told Jack in my response to his review in the Outcasts thread. The language depends on the character and how I view it, how it sounds in my head. That's the type of guy Whistler is, that's the type of language he uses. I can't hear him say "freaking" or "fricking" in my head. It's "fucking". It could be taken out, I guess, but I don't believe in censoring things. I hate the rating systems, as I've stated in the chatbox before, and feel like it's a damper on creativity. So there is going to be some language involved, whether it be the "f-word" or something much more minor. Plus, the inspiration I pull these series from (the Marvel Universe, of course) doesn't censor itself either. Some words, they do, but it's still there. You still know what they're saying -- and so that's how I feel with these shows. Only difference is I don't censor the word because how awkward would a "bleep" be in the middle of a sentence? But, yeah. I hope you guys can look passed the "language" stuff. Second, this episode felt like it focused on Abraham, more than it did on Abigail. To me, it felt like he was the main character and not her. That was something I picked up on. Abraham was meant to be a big focus in this episode because he's an important person in Abby's life. It was more about the two of them, together, rather than just Abigail in this episode. Overall, I really enjoyed this episode. I think this series could fit perfectly in the universe you have created, and I think many people could get behind it. Please don’t think I didn’t like this with the things I pointed out, because I really did enjoy this. And I support this, and good luck to you, Aimee, and anyone else working on this!
8.5/10 -- great second episode with very few flaws.
Thanks so much for the review, Brady! It's great knowing you guys are behind this darker addition to the VPN's Marvel Universe. |
|
|
|
Post by Aimee Nicole on May 10, 2012 21:30:15 GMT -6
Okay can I say Aimee you are the queen of descriptions. From start to finish you brought me into this world, described every detail, in far less words, and kept me interested the whole way. Bravo mame! The beginning 'fight' scene (I quote it because let's face it neither vamp had a chance Lmao!) was so well done. I could envision the whole thing and I even did a couple "Yays!" when Abigail landing blows to both Vampiric foe. Like I've said in the other reviews, I'm so glad that the change in my descriptions is being taken so well. It's definitely encouraging. It totally makes me happy and excited seeing that you guys are liking it so much. Maybe I really should stop doubting myself, lmfao. Ouch! Um. Very descriptive with the blade to the crotch Aimee. I felt that poor vamps pain. HAHA! I love Abigail already. She's had one line and it was practically the same line as the vamp but it was executed beautifully. I love the wit. Unfortunately, I can't take credit for that line. I really loved that as her opening line in the movie, so I kept it for Nightstalkers because I felt it was a really good way to "introduce" her character through her dialogue. That said though, I'm glad you like Abigail and I think you'll definitely keep those thoughts on her as the series progresses. I'm scared now. Whenever a show, especially one with action, and or violence, brings a kid into the picture I automatically get all poppa bear like and I don't want anything to happen to this kid. DO YOU HEAR ME AIMEE NOT A SINGLE SCRATCH!! Lmao! I love the playfulness between Abigail and Zooey. LMAO! I know what you mean about kids in shows like this. I'm excited knowing that you guys like Zoey, because she's definitely going to be expanded on as the series goes. Her and Abigail's bond is something that's going to be really important later on. A blind techy? Love it! I like the dynamic between Taylor and Abigail. Oh and they turned out to be a couple. I was just sitting here thinking "They may be flirting with eachother". Lmao! I love being right. XD And Mr. Spark's name's been dropped. I love the connections the 'shows' are making already. Taylor is definitely one of the ones I think might end up being a favorite of the fans -- or at least, I hope so. I'm glad you like the interactions between them, they're really fun to write. At first, I was nervous about it and wasn't sure how it was going to turn out, but it ended up coming to me quite easily. Did I really put Spark? Oh God. I'm gonna have to go look LMFAO. If I did, I meant Stark. Tony Stark. I feel like it's important to connect these shows together from the start, either in a big or small way. With this, it was simply that Stark pays Abby for her unique technology she designed herself and sold to him. The connection to the Outcasts won't be as clear for a while, seeing as how the first two planned sequences of "Nightstalkers" takes place before Outcasts begins, timeline wise. I'm totally glad you caught that, though! XD Great episode, excellent descriptions, interesting characters, I don't have a bad thing to say about it. Loved it. 10/10. It was nice hearing from you, and refreshing to see a new face -- not that I don't totally love Jack and Brady, 'cause I totally do and they know I do. But I don't think I've gotten a review from you before, so this was pretty awesome. On that, thanks so much for reading and reviewing, Darrin! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2012 4:36:28 GMT -6
Did I write Spark?? Bwhahaha! I meant Stark. Omg! We totally had this conversation last night Lmao! Well folks that's what you get when you scribble down notes as you read, lesson #1 make sure it's legible so when you post a review you don't come off sounding dumb Lmao!
|
|
